All posts by twgrouprachel

THE VALUE OF HAVING SEEN IT BEFORE

THE VALUE OF HAVING SEEN IT BEFORE

There is a point in many careers when experience becomes a euphemism. You are praised for having accumulated it, then quietly encouraged to make room for somebody with less of it!

This is an odd approach to professional advice. We would not question the value of an experienced surgeon, barrister or pilot. Yet in communications, familiarity with what happened last time can be treated as less useful than enthusiasm for whatever might come next.

At Gong, our senior team includes four advisers with more than 25 years’ experience each. Between us, we have worked through short-seller attacks, difficult corporate transactions, security alerts, hostile media campaigns and intensely personal situations involving senior leaders. We have advised organisations operating across markets where commercial decisions are closely entwined with politics, communities alongside public expectations.

We have also launched companies into sceptical markets, introduced journalists to technologies that barely made sense at the time and managed important events at which the guest of honour was several hours late. Experience teaches you that reputational challenges come in many forms. Some are genuinely serious. Others look serious at the time but can be resolved with a calm head and good judgement.

The value clients get from an experienced adviser is not simply knowledge of communications. It is judgement about what matters now, what may matter in two hours and what will probably have disappeared by tomorrow morning.

Knowing when an issue is serious

One member of our team once received a call from an FT journalist who had heard a short seller publicly criticising a client’s accounting practices. The short seller’s name was not widely recognised at the time, but it was familiar to the adviser because of an earlier attack on another complex international business.

That recollection changed the assessment immediately. This was not treated as an awkward media enquiry to be managed by the communications team. The chief executive was alerted at once. He abandoned his travel plans, cleared his diary and led the response.

The attack developed into a sustained and aggressive campaign, but the company was ready to rebut the accusations clearly from the outset. It emerged from the episode in a stronger position.

It is tempting to describe this as instinct. In reality, instinct in business is often experience arriving at a conclusion before we have had time to write the conclusion down.

In reputation management, the visible problem is not always the most important one. An unhelpful article may pass quickly. A seemingly obscure allegation may be the opening move in a much more serious challenge. The adviser’s job is to distinguish between them without either creating panic or offering reassurance that events may soon disprove.

As Sir Andrew Likierman, former Dean of London Business School, has written, judgement is the ability to combine personal qualities with relevant knowledge and experience to form opinions and make decisions. That combination matters because reputational questions rarely arrive with complete evidence or an obvious answer.

Preventing the crisis that never happens

The most valuable communications work is sometimes the work nobody notices.

A private equity client was preparing to sell an education and professional qualifications business. The transaction depended on securing sufficient support from its membership and student community. A vote against the sale would have jeopardised the exit and created a much wider reputational problem. Our team did not wait for opposition to gather momentum. We developed a campaign that brought students into the discussion directly, including through events on campus. Local radio, newspapers and video were used to explain the case for the transaction in terms that mattered to the people being asked to support it. The necessary vote was secured. There was no crisis, no emergency response and no dramatic story about how the business had been saved. The transaction simply moved forward.

The value of strategic communications often lies in recognising where confidence could break down while there is still time to act.

Calm does not mean passive

Another member of the team was working on a large event at a mixed-use development in a developing market when rumours of a bomb alert began circulating on social media. Senior people from the private equity owners were brought together on site. The team established what was known, prepared an accurate statement and arranged a press briefing within hours. The aim was not merely to respond quickly. It was to answer the questions that would otherwise be filled by speculation. The rumour lost momentum and the event went ahead the following day, attended by hundreds of people.

Calm advice rarely looks dramatic. In this case, it meant establishing the facts, anticipating questions and preventing speculation from taking hold.  Experience also teaches that not every question needs an immediate answer and that clients rarely benefit from false certainty.

Not every accusation deserves an explanation

Organisations under attack often feel compelled to explain themselves immediately. That can be a mistake, particularly when the allegation itself is untrue.

One client faced hostile coverage after competitors briefed a national newspaper about its business. The instinctive response might have been to produce a lengthy defence, addressing each claim and explaining the context. Instead, our team examined the premise of the story and concluded that the central assertions were false.

Lawyers were brought in and the original story was stopped.

The right response is not always to communicate more. Sometimes it is to correct the record firmly; sometimes it is to say very little. The decision turns on the facts, the credibility of the source and the consequences of allowing the allegation to stand.

The task is not to apply a standard response process, but to recognise which kind of problem the organisation is facing. 

The right experience in the room

Clients rarely come to us because life is calm. It might be that something important is changing, a decision is attracting attention, expectations have shifted, or a situation that once felt manageable has evolved into something unexpectedly complex.

Communications expertise matters in those moments, but experience matters too. Not because it gives anyone a crystal ball, but because it helps separate what is genuinely unusual from what simply feels unusual in the moment.

The examples here come from four members of our team, but the underlying experience is broader. Across Gong, advisers have supported organisations through transactions, scrutiny and periods of significant change in different sectors and markets. The common task is helping clients make clear decisions when pressure makes that harder.

Experience cannot prevent the unexpected. Its value is having people beside you who can keep their perspective when it happens.

HOW TO MAKE YOUR STORY WORK FOR MEDIA ACROSS AFRICA

HOW TO MAKE YOUR STORY WORK FOR MEDIA ACROSS AFRICA

For organisations working across African markets, a strong story is just the beginning. This piece from our sister agency in Nairobi, Gong Communications Kenya, delves what makes a story work for local media. It’s about  relevance, timing, proof and the ability to explain why it matters to the audience in that market. 

STARMER NEVER FOUND THE SENTENCE

STARMER NEVER FOUND THE SENTENCE 

Sir Keir Starmer’s resignation as UK Prime Minister has prompted plenty of political analysis. But for anyone who works with leaders on messaging, media interviews and presentations, there is a more specific lesson.

The issue was not simply that Starmer needed to communicate more. It was that he needed to find a clearer, more human way to explain what he was trying to do and why it mattered.

That is a problem for any leader.

It is also why the usual line that ‘he did nothing’ is too simple. There were things his government said it would do and then did. Workers’ rights are a good example. While not everyone saw those changes as positive, many employers for example have real concerns about complexity and the impact on business, but politically, it was a significant piece of delivery. It was part of the offer. It happened.

And yet it did not seem to cut through.

That is the communications lesson. Delivery does not speak for itself.  A policy may pass for instance, or a reform may be introduced. A promise may technically be kept. But if people cannot understand what has changed and how it connects to their own lives, it may not land as progress at all.

Many senior figures have a strategy. They have policy detail, evidence, briefings, announcements and proof points. What they often do not have is the sentence. The clear, human line that explains what they are doing and why people should care.

Starmer’s difficulty was that he often sounded prepared, but was not always understood. Serious, but not always connected. Across interviews, speeches and public appearances, the message often felt managed rather than, well,  felt. There was no simple organising thought that people could repeat back.

That is a dangerous place for any leader to be.

If people cannot describe what you stand for, they will fill the gap themselves. If they cannot see how your work connects to their lives, they may conclude nothing is happening. If your language sounds more internal than human, you may look competent in the room but remote outside it.

This is where leadership communication often breaks down.

People don’t experience government, business or institutional life as a list of achievements. People experience pressure, they face uncertainty, frustration and hope. They experience whether they can get a doctors’ appointment, pay the bills, manage work, care for their family or feel that things are moving in the right direction.

Good messaging has to connect with that reality.

On workers’ rights, for example, the stronger communication route would not have been to rely on the language of legislation or the biggest upgrade in a generation. It would have been to keep translating the change into everyday terms. What does it mean for someone who gets ill and cannot afford to lose pay? What does it mean for someone on insecure hours? What does it mean for a small business trying to plan properly? What are the trade-offs, and why does the government think they are worth it?

That is the sort of language people can test against their own lives.

The stronger approach would have been to explain the work in language people could actually use and recognise. And this is something that The Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani has done well, using a direct and jargon free communications style.

What is the one thing people need to understand? What is the human problem being solved? What proof point makes that believable? What is still difficult, and how do you acknowledge that without sounding defensive?

Those questions matter in a media interview, but they matter just as much in a board presentation, a town hall, a pitch or a crisis statement. Leaders are judged not only on what they do, but on whether they can make people understand the purpose behind it.

This is not about becoming more performative. It is not about chasing charisma or trying to sound like someone else. In fact, that is often where leaders get into trouble because audiences can feel when tone is being bolted on.  The real skill is finding language that is clear enough to travel and authentic enough to believe.

Sir Keir’s communication often seemed to sit somewhere between policy language and political slogan. ‘Change’ was too broad to carry the weight of government. The missing piece was a more concrete expression of what that change meant in everyday terms.

Before any major speech, media interview or public moment, the test should be simple. Can you say what you mean in a sentence a real person would understand? Can you say it under pressure? Can you say it without sounding as though it has been written for you? And can your audience repeat it afterwards?

If the answer is no, it’s not ready for the public.

Starmer’s departure will be analysed politically at length.  But from a communications point of view, it is a reminder that leadership depends on more than plans, policies or competence.  At some point, every leader has to stand up and make people understand. He never quite did.

(With thanks to Pippa for the original inspiration behind this article).

Proud to be a B1

We are thrilled to announce that we are now part of the B1 community. 

B1s are businesses that are both B Corp certified and members of 1% for the Planet. It is a practical combination. B Corp looks at how a business is run. 1% for the Planet commits members to giving 1% of annual revenue to approved environmental partners. 

For us, this is about being clear on how we work and where we put our money. The 1% for the Planet network now includes more than 4,300 businesses across more than 110 countries. Its members have contributed over $870 million in certified giving to environmental causes with the UK its third biggest market. 

Global members include Patagonia, the outdoor clothing and equipment company that helped start 1% for the Planet, and OXO, the kitchenware and home products brand. 

We are so pleased to be members ourselves as well as working with 1% for the Planet, supporting with communications strategy and media relations on making environmental giving easier for businesses to understand and act on 

Of course, certifications like these are not a substitute for doing the work. They do, however, give companies a clearer framework for action and a more credible way to talk about progress. And that matters in a market where customers, employees and partners are paying closer attention to what businesses say  and whether they can back it up. Our colleagues at Wilful have written a handy guide to some certifications here.   

READ HERE >